In the world of process improvement, identifying bottlenecks and constraints is fundamental to achieving operational excellence. The Analyse phase of the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) methodology provides the perfect framework for uncovering these limitations. When combined with the Theory of Constraints (TOC), professionals gain a powerful approach to pinpoint and address the critical factors that prevent organizations from achieving their goals.
Understanding the Theory of Constraints
The Theory of Constraints, developed by Dr. Eliyahu Goldratt in the 1980s, is built on a simple yet profound premise: every system has at least one constraint that limits its overall performance. Like a chain that is only as strong as its weakest link, a process can only perform as well as its most restrictive step allows. You might also enjoy reading about Analyze Phase for Beginners: Statistical Concepts Made Simple in Lean Six Sigma.
In the context of Lean Six Sigma’s Analyse phase, TOC provides a structured method for identifying these constraints. Rather than attempting to improve everything simultaneously, TOC directs attention and resources toward the critical few elements that will deliver the greatest impact on overall system performance. You might also enjoy reading about Excel for Six Sigma Analysis: Built-In Tools for Statistical Testing.
Types of Constraints in Organizational Processes
Before diving into analysis techniques, it is essential to understand the various types of constraints that may exist within an organization:
Physical Constraints
These are tangible limitations related to equipment, facilities, or materials. A manufacturing line with one machine that operates significantly slower than others represents a physical constraint. For instance, if a production facility has five workstations and one can only process 100 units per hour while others process 150 units per hour, that slower station becomes the bottleneck.
Policy Constraints
These are rules, procedures, or practices that limit system performance. A company policy requiring three levels of approval for purchases under $500 might significantly slow down procurement processes, even when resources are available.
Market Constraints
When demand for products or services is less than the system’s capacity to deliver, the market becomes the constraint. This scenario requires different strategies compared to internal process constraints.
Resource Constraints
Limited availability of skilled personnel, budget restrictions, or insufficient raw materials can severely restrict process throughput and quality outcomes.
Applying Theory of Constraints During the Analyse Phase
The Analyse phase in DMAIC focuses on understanding why problems occur and what factors contribute to process variation. Integrating TOC into this phase follows a systematic approach that aligns perfectly with Lean Six Sigma principles.
Step 1: Identify the Constraint
The first step involves mapping the entire process and collecting data to determine where work accumulates. Consider a customer service department handling insurance claims with the following weekly processing data:
- Initial Document Review: 500 claims processed
- Data Entry and Verification: 500 claims processed
- Fraud Assessment: 320 claims processed
- Manager Approval: 480 claims processed
- Final Processing and Payment: 500 claims processed
In this example, the Fraud Assessment stage processes only 320 claims per week while other stages handle significantly more. This creates a backlog and identifies the constraint clearly. The data shows that even though Initial Document Review can handle 500 claims, the system’s overall throughput is limited to 320 claims per week due to the bottleneck at Fraud Assessment.
Step 2: Exploit the Constraint
Once identified, the next step is to ensure the constraint operates at maximum efficiency without additional investment. This means eliminating any waste or downtime at the bottleneck.
For the insurance claims example, exploitation might involve:
- Ensuring fraud assessors have no administrative tasks that reduce their assessment time
- Implementing a priority system so assessors work on the most critical claims first
- Reducing unnecessary quality checks at this stage that might be better performed elsewhere
- Ensuring assessors have uninterrupted work time with minimized meetings and distractions
Suppose the fraud assessment team spends 30% of their time on administrative reporting. By reassigning these tasks, the team could potentially increase throughput from 320 to approximately 416 claims per week without any additional resources.
Step 3: Subordinate Everything Else
All other processes should be adjusted to support the constraint. There is no value in upstream processes producing more than the constraint can handle, as this only creates excess inventory and waste.
In our example, having Initial Document Review process 500 claims when Fraud Assessment can only handle 320 creates a backlog of 180 claims each week. This work in progress inventory leads to longer cycle times, increased storage costs, and potential quality issues as documents age.
By subordinating upstream processes to match the constraint’s capacity, the organization can achieve smoother flow and better resource utilization. The Initial Document Review team might use their excess capacity for training, process improvement activities, or assisting with downstream tasks.
Step 4: Elevate the Constraint
If exploitation and subordination do not provide sufficient improvement, the next step is to invest in increasing the constraint’s capacity. This might involve hiring additional staff, purchasing equipment, implementing automation, or redesigning the process.
For the fraud assessment bottleneck, elevation strategies could include:
- Hiring two additional fraud assessors (increasing capacity from 320 to approximately 448 claims per week)
- Implementing automated fraud detection software to handle routine cases (potentially doubling throughput)
- Cross-training staff from other departments to assist during peak periods
- Outsourcing a portion of straightforward fraud assessments to a specialized service provider
Step 5: Repeat the Process
Once a constraint is broken, a new constraint will emerge elsewhere in the system. This is not a failure but rather the nature of continuous improvement. The process begins again with identifying the new constraint.
If the fraud assessment capacity increases to 500 claims per week through automation, Manager Approval at 480 claims per week becomes the new constraint requiring attention.
Practical Data Analysis Techniques for Constraint Identification
During the Analyse phase, several quantitative techniques help identify constraints effectively:
Cycle Time Analysis
Measuring the time each process step takes reveals where delays occur. Consider a manufacturing process with the following cycle times:
- Cutting: 2 minutes per unit
- Assembly: 8 minutes per unit
- Quality Check: 3 minutes per unit
- Packaging: 2 minutes per unit
Assembly clearly takes the longest time per unit, making it the primary constraint that determines overall production rate at 7.5 units per hour.
Work in Progress Tracking
Monitoring inventory levels between process steps identifies where work accumulates. High WIP levels immediately upstream of a process step indicate a constraint at that step.
Utilization Rates
Calculating what percentage of available time each resource spends on productive work helps identify constraints. A resource operating at 95% utilization while others operate at 60% likely represents a bottleneck.
The Value of TOC Integration with Lean Six Sigma
Combining Theory of Constraints with Lean Six Sigma methodology creates a comprehensive improvement approach. While Lean focuses on waste elimination and Six Sigma emphasizes variation reduction, TOC ensures efforts concentrate on the constraint that most limits system performance.
This integration prevents the common pitfall of improving non-constraint processes, which provides minimal impact on overall performance. By focusing improvement efforts where they matter most, organizations achieve faster results with fewer resources.
Moreover, TOC provides a logical sequence for improvement activities. Understanding which constraint to address first, second, and third creates a roadmap that guides improvement teams through their journey toward operational excellence.
Real World Impact
Organizations that effectively apply Theory of Constraints during their Analyse phase typically see dramatic improvements. A logistics company that identified their warehouse picking process as the constraint and implemented TOC principles increased throughput by 40% within three months without capital investment. A healthcare facility that recognized their diagnostic imaging equipment as the constraint restructured scheduling and extended operating hours, reducing patient wait times by 35%.
These results demonstrate that constraint identification and management often delivers more significant improvements than broad-based optimization efforts that spread resources thinly across all process areas.
Conclusion
The Analyse phase of Lean Six Sigma provides the perfect opportunity to apply Theory of Constraints principles. By systematically identifying constraints, exploiting their capacity, subordinating other processes, and elevating performance where necessary, organizations can achieve breakthrough improvements in throughput, quality, and customer satisfaction.
Understanding these principles is not merely academic; it represents a fundamental shift in how improvement professionals approach problem-solving. Rather than optimizing everything, TOC teaches us to find and address the critical few factors that truly limit performance.
The journey toward process excellence requires both knowledge and practical application. Whether you are new to process improvement or looking to deepen your expertise, formal training provides the foundation for success.
Enrol in Lean Six Sigma Training Today
Transform your career and your organization’s performance by mastering the integration of Theory of Constraints with Lean Six Sigma methodology. Our comprehensive training programs provide hands-on experience with real-world case studies, data analysis techniques, and constraint identification methods that deliver measurable results. Don’t let knowledge constraints limit your professional growth. Take the first step toward becoming a certified improvement professional and unlock your potential to drive meaningful change. Enrol in our Lean Six Sigma training today and join thousands of professionals who have elevated their careers and transformed their organizations through structured process improvement excellence.
