Control Phase: Understanding Statistical Process Control Charts in Lean Six Sigma

In the world of quality management and continuous improvement, maintaining consistent process performance is just as crucial as achieving initial improvements. The Control Phase of the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology serves as the guardian of process stability, and at its heart lies a powerful tool: Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts. These charts transform raw data into visual insights that help organizations maintain the gains achieved through improvement initiatives.

What Are Statistical Process Control Charts?

Statistical Process Control charts, commonly known as SPC charts or control charts, are graphical tools used to monitor process behavior over time. Developed by Walter Shewhart in the 1920s at Bell Laboratories, these charts distinguish between two types of process variation: common cause variation (inherent to the process) and special cause variation (resulting from specific, identifiable factors). You might also enjoy reading about Lean Six Sigma Control Phase: The Complete Guide for 2025.

The fundamental principle behind SPC charts is straightforward: they plot process data points in time sequence and establish statistically calculated control limits. These limits help practitioners determine whether a process is operating in a stable, predictable manner or if it requires intervention. You might also enjoy reading about From Control to Continuous Improvement: Next Steps After Project Completion.

The Anatomy of a Control Chart

Every control chart contains several essential components that work together to provide meaningful insights:

  • Center Line (CL): Represents the process average or mean
  • Upper Control Limit (UCL): The upper boundary, typically set at three standard deviations above the mean
  • Lower Control Limit (LCL): The lower boundary, typically set at three standard deviations below the mean
  • Data Points: Individual measurements plotted chronologically
  • Time Axis: Shows when measurements were taken

These elements create a visual framework that allows quality professionals to quickly identify when processes deviate from expected performance.

Types of Control Charts

Different types of control charts serve different purposes, depending on the nature of the data being collected. Understanding which chart to use is critical for accurate process monitoring.

Variable Control Charts

Variable control charts are used for continuous data that can be measured on a scale. The most common types include:

X-bar and R Charts: The X-bar chart monitors the process mean, while the R chart tracks the range or variation within subgroups. These charts work in tandem to provide comprehensive process oversight.

X-bar and S Charts: Similar to X-bar and R charts, but use standard deviation instead of range to measure variability. This approach is more accurate when subgroup sizes exceed 10 observations.

Individual and Moving Range (I-MR) Charts: Used when measurements are taken individually rather than in subgroups, such as in chemical batch processes or monthly sales figures.

Attribute Control Charts

Attribute control charts monitor discrete data, such as counts or proportions. Common types include:

P Charts: Track the proportion of defective items in varying sample sizes.

NP Charts: Monitor the number of defective items when sample sizes remain constant.

C Charts: Count the number of defects when the sample size or area of opportunity stays constant.

U Charts: Track the rate of defects per unit when sample sizes vary.

Practical Example: Implementing an X-bar and R Chart

To illustrate how control charts work in practice, consider a manufacturing scenario. A pharmaceutical company produces tablets and needs to monitor the weight of each tablet to ensure consistency and regulatory compliance. The target weight is 500 milligrams.

The quality team collects samples of five tablets every hour over 20 hours. Here is a sample of their data:

Sample Data Set (First 5 Subgroups):

  • Subgroup 1: 498, 502, 501, 499, 500 mg (Average: 500.0 mg, Range: 4 mg)
  • Subgroup 2: 501, 503, 500, 502, 499 mg (Average: 501.0 mg, Range: 4 mg)
  • Subgroup 3: 497, 499, 498, 500, 501 mg (Average: 499.0 mg, Range: 4 mg)
  • Subgroup 4: 500, 501, 499, 502, 498 mg (Average: 500.0 mg, Range: 4 mg)
  • Subgroup 5: 502, 500, 501, 499, 503 mg (Average: 501.0 mg, Range: 4 mg)

Calculating Control Limits

After collecting all 20 subgroups, the team calculates the overall process average (X-double bar) and average range (R-bar):

  • X-double bar (Grand Average): 500.2 mg
  • R-bar (Average Range): 4.2 mg

Using standard control chart constants for a subgroup size of 5, they calculate the control limits:

For the X-bar Chart:

  • UCL = X-double bar + (A2 × R-bar) = 500.2 + (0.577 × 4.2) = 502.6 mg
  • CL = 500.2 mg
  • LCL = X-double bar – (A2 × R-bar) = 500.2 – (0.577 × 4.2) = 497.8 mg

For the R Chart:

  • UCL = D4 × R-bar = 2.114 × 4.2 = 8.9 mg
  • CL = 4.2 mg
  • LCL = D3 × R-bar = 0 × 4.2 = 0 mg

Interpreting Control Charts

The true value of control charts lies not just in creating them, but in correctly interpreting the patterns they reveal. A process is considered out of control when any of these conditions occur:

Rule Violations Indicating Special Cause Variation

  • Point Beyond Control Limits: Any data point falling outside the UCL or LCL
  • Run of Eight: Eight or more consecutive points on one side of the center line
  • Trend Pattern: Six or more consecutive points steadily increasing or decreasing
  • Two Out of Three: Two out of three consecutive points in the outer third region (beyond two standard deviations)
  • Four Out of Five: Four out of five consecutive points in the outer two-thirds region
  • Cycles or Patterns: Non-random patterns suggesting systematic influences

When any of these patterns appear, it signals the presence of special cause variation requiring investigation and corrective action.

Benefits of Statistical Process Control

Organizations that effectively implement SPC charts experience numerous advantages:

Early Detection of Problems: SPC charts identify process shifts before they result in significant quality issues or customer complaints, enabling proactive rather than reactive management.

Reduced Waste: By maintaining process stability, companies minimize scrap, rework, and other forms of waste, directly impacting profitability.

Data-Driven Decision Making: Control charts replace gut feelings with statistical evidence, leading to more effective improvement decisions.

Process Understanding: Regular monitoring deepens understanding of process capabilities and limitations.

Regulatory Compliance: Many industries require documented process control, and SPC charts provide the necessary evidence of consistent quality management.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Despite their power, control charts can be misused or misinterpreted. Avoid these common mistakes:

Tampering: Adjusting a stable process in response to common cause variation often increases variability rather than reducing it.

Using Specification Limits as Control Limits: Specification limits (customer requirements) differ fundamentally from control limits (statistical boundaries based on process performance).

Ignoring Out-of-Control Signals: When control charts signal problems, prompt investigation is essential. Ignoring these warnings defeats the purpose of monitoring.

Inadequate Training: Team members must understand both the statistical foundations and practical applications of control charts to use them effectively.

Integrating SPC into the Control Phase

Within the broader DMAIC framework, the Control Phase ensures that improvements achieved during the Improve Phase become the new standard. Statistical Process Control charts serve as the primary mechanism for this sustainability.

After implementing process improvements, teams establish control charts to monitor critical process parameters. They document procedures, train operators, and create response plans for out-of-control conditions. Regular review meetings assess chart data and drive continuous improvement efforts.

This systematic approach transforms temporary gains into permanent competitive advantages, ensuring that the investment in improvement initiatives delivers lasting value.

Taking Your Skills to the Next Level

Understanding Statistical Process Control charts represents just one aspect of comprehensive quality management expertise. The principles discussed here form the foundation of process excellence, but mastering their application requires structured learning and hands-on practice.

Lean Six Sigma training provides the comprehensive knowledge and practical skills needed to implement effective process control systems. Whether you are beginning your quality journey or seeking to advance your capabilities, professional certification offers structured learning paths that combine statistical rigor with real-world application.

From Yellow Belt fundamentals through Black Belt mastery, Lean Six Sigma training equips professionals with the tools, techniques, and confidence to drive meaningful organizational improvement. Control charts become more powerful when integrated with the full DMAIC methodology, supported by change management skills and leadership development.

Enrol in Lean Six Sigma Training Today and join thousands of professionals who have transformed their careers and their organizations through quality excellence. Gain the credentials that employers value, develop skills that drive results, and become part of a global community committed to continuous improvement. Your journey toward process excellence begins with a single step forward. Take that step today.

Related Posts