In the world of continuous improvement and quality management, achieving initial success is only half the battle. The real challenge lies in maintaining those improvements over time. This is where Statistical Process Control (SPC) becomes an invaluable tool during the Sustain phase of Lean Six Sigma projects. Understanding how to effectively implement and utilize SPC can mean the difference between temporary gains and lasting organizational transformation.
Understanding the Sustain Phase
The Sustain phase represents the final stage in many continuous improvement methodologies, including Lean Six Sigma’s DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) framework. After investing significant time and resources into improving a process, organizations must ensure that these improvements do not deteriorate over time. The Sustain phase focuses on embedding new processes into the organizational culture and monitoring performance to prevent regression to old habits. You might also enjoy reading about How to Create Effective Standard Operating Procedures: A Complete Guide for Business Success.
Statistical Process Control serves as the backbone of this monitoring effort, providing objective, data-driven insights into process performance and stability. Rather than relying on subjective observations or periodic audits, SPC offers a systematic approach to detecting variations and trends before they become significant problems. You might also enjoy reading about Training Your Team to Maintain New Processes: A Complete Guide to Sustainable Implementation.
What is Statistical Process Control?
Statistical Process Control is a methodology that uses statistical techniques to monitor and control processes. Developed by Walter Shewhart in the 1920s, SPC helps distinguish between common cause variation (inherent to the process) and special cause variation (resulting from specific, identifiable factors). This distinction is crucial because it determines the appropriate response to process changes.
The primary tool in SPC is the control chart, which displays process data over time along with statistically determined control limits. These charts enable teams to visualize process behavior and identify when intervention is necessary.
Implementing SPC in the Sustain Phase
Selecting the Right Metrics
The first step in implementing SPC during the Sustain phase involves selecting appropriate Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that reflect the improvements made during the project. These metrics should be directly linked to customer requirements and business objectives. Common examples include defect rates, cycle times, customer satisfaction scores, or production yields.
For instance, if your improvement project focused on reducing customer service response times, your SPC system should monitor average response time, variation in response times, and the percentage of responses meeting target timeframes.
Establishing Control Limits
Control limits represent the boundaries of normal process variation. These are calculated using statistical formulas based on historical data from the improved process. It is essential to distinguish control limits from specification limits. While specification limits represent customer requirements or business standards, control limits reflect what the process is actually capable of producing.
Let us examine a practical example with sample data. Suppose a call center improved its average response time to customer inquiries. After the improvement phase, the team collected data over 25 days to establish baseline performance:
Sample Dataset: Daily Average Response Time (minutes)
- Day 1-5: 4.2, 4.5, 4.1, 4.6, 4.3
- Day 6-10: 4.4, 4.2, 4.7, 4.3, 4.5
- Day 11-15: 4.6, 4.1, 4.4, 4.5, 4.2
- Day 16-20: 4.3, 4.6, 4.4, 4.2, 4.5
- Day 21-25: 4.4, 4.3, 4.5, 4.2, 4.6
From this data, the team calculates an average response time of 4.38 minutes with an upper control limit of 5.1 minutes and a lower control limit of 3.7 minutes (using standard SPC formulas for individual measurements). These control limits establish the boundaries for normal process variation.
Creating and Interpreting Control Charts
Control charts provide visual representation of process performance over time. The most common types include X-bar and R charts for variable data, and p-charts or c-charts for attribute data. Each chart type serves specific purposes depending on the nature of the data being collected.
In our call center example, an individuals chart (I-chart) would plot each day’s average response time. The center line represents the process average (4.38 minutes), with upper and lower control limits drawn at calculated distances from this average. As long as data points fall within these limits and display random variation, the process is considered stable and in control.
Recognizing Signals of Process Change
SPC relies on specific rules to identify when a process may be experiencing special cause variation. These rules help teams distinguish between normal fluctuation and meaningful changes requiring investigation:
- Any point falling outside the control limits
- Seven consecutive points all above or all below the center line
- Seven consecutive points all increasing or all decreasing
- Fourteen points alternating up and down
- Two out of three consecutive points in the outer third of the control zone
Continuing with our call center example, imagine that in week six after implementing SPC, the daily averages were: 4.8, 5.0, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4 minutes. This pattern shows seven consecutive points increasing, which signals special cause variation even though no individual point exceeded the upper control limit. This early warning allows the team to investigate before performance deteriorates further.
Responding to Variation
The true value of SPC lies not just in detecting variation but in responding appropriately. When control charts signal special cause variation, teams should investigate immediately to identify root causes. This might involve reviewing recent process changes, interviewing staff members, examining equipment maintenance records, or analyzing environmental factors.
In the call center scenario, investigation might reveal that the increasing response times coincided with new staff members joining the team without adequate training, or perhaps a software update that slowed system performance. Identifying these specific causes enables targeted corrective action rather than broad, potentially ineffective interventions.
Conversely, when processes remain in statistical control, managers should resist the temptation to react to every individual fluctuation. Overreacting to common cause variation often introduces additional instability and wastes resources. This discipline in decision-making represents one of SPC’s greatest benefits.
Integrating SPC into Daily Operations
For SPC to effectively sustain improvements, it must become part of regular business operations rather than an additional bureaucratic burden. This integration requires several elements:
Automation and Technology
Modern quality management software can automatically collect data, generate control charts, and alert relevant personnel when signals occur. This automation reduces manual effort and ensures timely responses to process changes.
Training and Competency
All individuals involved in process monitoring must understand basic SPC concepts, how to interpret control charts, and when to escalate concerns. Regular training refreshers help maintain this competency over time.
Clear Accountability
Organizations should designate specific individuals or teams responsible for monitoring control charts, investigating signals, and implementing corrective actions. Without clear ownership, SPC systems often fall into neglect.
Regular Review Meetings
Scheduled meetings to review SPC data ensure that process performance remains visible to leadership and that emerging trends receive appropriate attention. These sessions also reinforce the importance of data-driven decision making.
Long-Term Benefits of SPC in the Sustain Phase
Organizations that successfully implement SPC during the Sustain phase realize numerous benefits beyond maintaining improvement gains. These advantages include reduced firefighting and crisis management, as problems are detected and addressed early. Teams develop greater process knowledge and capability, leading to increased confidence and engagement. Customer satisfaction improves as process consistency increases, and organizations build a culture of continuous improvement supported by objective data rather than opinions.
Furthermore, the discipline of SPC creates organizational learning opportunities. Over time, the accumulation of control chart data and documented responses to variation builds institutional knowledge about process behavior and effective interventions.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Despite its benefits, SPC implementation can encounter obstacles. Common pitfalls include selecting too many metrics to monitor, creating analysis paralysis, or choosing metrics that do not truly reflect process performance. Calculating control limits incorrectly or using inappropriate chart types leads to false signals and lost credibility. Perhaps most critically, collecting data without acting on signals renders the entire system pointless and demoralizes team members.
Success requires starting with a focused set of critical metrics, ensuring proper training in SPC methodology, and maintaining organizational discipline to investigate and respond to signals consistently.
Conclusion
Statistical Process Control represents an essential tool for sustaining process improvements over time. By providing objective, data-driven monitoring of process performance, SPC enables organizations to detect and respond to variation before it significantly impacts quality, efficiency, or customer satisfaction. The methodology transforms improvement from a one-time project into an ongoing commitment to excellence.
Implementing SPC effectively requires understanding both the statistical foundations and the practical application within daily operations. When properly deployed during the Sustain phase, control charts become more than monitoring tools; they become conversation starters, problem-solving guides, and evidence of organizational maturity in quality management.
The investment in SPC infrastructure, training, and discipline pays dividends through sustained performance, reduced variation, and a culture that values continuous improvement. Organizations that master this approach position themselves for long-term competitive advantage through operational excellence.
Enrol in Lean Six Sigma Training Today
Are you ready to master Statistical Process Control and other powerful continuous improvement tools? Our comprehensive Lean Six Sigma training programs provide the knowledge and practical skills needed to drive sustainable improvements in your organization. Whether you are beginning your quality journey with Yellow Belt certification or advancing to Black Belt mastery, our expert instructors will guide you through proven methodologies used by leading organizations worldwide. Do not let your improvement gains fade over time. Enrol in Lean Six Sigma training today and become the change agent your organization needs. Visit our website to explore certification options and start your transformation journey.
