In the realm of cash logistics, the customer does not experience separate activities such as pickup, transport, vault sorting, reconciliation and account posting. They experience one outcome: cash collected securely, verified accurately and credited on time.
Value Stream Mapping (VSM) makes that end-to-end flow visible. It connects the physical movement of cash with the information flow that authorises, reconciles and credits the deposit. This distinction matters because a process can be secure and busy while still creating avoidable waiting, duplicate verification and delayed availability of funds.
This worked case study examines a cash-in-transit (CIT) and vault processing value stream serving 620 retail pickups per day across three depots and 11 CIT vehicles. The scope begins with scheduled retail collection and ends when reconciled funds are credited to customer accounts.
The case excludes ATM replenishment planning, ATM forecasting and downstream cash distribution. It focuses specifically on the retail deposit journey.
Scope, Customer Requirements and Takt Context
The primary customer requirements are:
- Secure and traceable cash movement
- Accurate denomination and counterfeit verification
- Reconciled manifests without repeated manual checking
- Predictable, same-day or near-same-day credit
- Rapid investigation of genuine discrepancies
The depot sorting window is 480 minutes per day. With 620 pickup bags requiring processing, the available takt is:
480 minutes × 60 seconds ÷ 620 bags = 46.5 seconds per bag
For planning purposes, this is approximately 46 seconds per pickup bag.
Takt time is not the same as the processing time of one person or one machine. The current-state activities occur across multiple workstations and shifts. Takt establishes the required rhythm for the depot system as a whole.
Relevant external cash-management practices include documented chain of custody, vault verification, cash sorting and reconciliation between physical cash and system records. These principles are also reflected in industry cash-in-transit and cash-processing services such as Brink’s armoured cash-in-transit services and cash processing services.
Current-State Map: Where the Reconciliation Gap Forms
The current-state flow is:
Scheduled Retail Pickup
↓
CIT Crew Collection and Seal Confirmation
↓
Route Transit to Depot
↓
Depot Check-In and Seal Verification
↓
Vault Sort and Denomination
↓
Manual Note Verification and Counterfeit Check
↓
Manifest Reconciliation
↓
Discrepancy Investigation, if required
↓
Credit Posted at 15:40 on the Following Business Day

The current process contains several disconnected schedules. CIT routes are planned around collection windows, depot operations are managed around sorting capacity, and credit posting is governed by a later reconciliation cycle. Each schedule may be reasonable in isolation, but their combined handoffs create a longer cash cycle.
Current-State Data
| Process measure | Current performance |
|---|---|
| Retail pickup volume | 620 bags per day |
| Depots | 3 |
| CIT vehicles | 11 |
| Average route run time | 8.2 hours |
| Route back-tracking | 14% |
| Depot check-in and seal verification | 6.4 minutes per bag |
| Vault sort and denomination | 12.8 minutes per bag |
| Manual note verification and counterfeit check | 9.1 minutes per bag |
| Manifest reconciliation | 22 minutes per manifest |
| Credit posting | 15:40 following business day |
| Discrepancy rate | 1.9% |
| Manifest mismatch rate | 7% of runs |
| Manual recount rate | 23% |
| Average cash cycle | 3.4 days |
| Process value-added time | 38 minutes |
| On-time credit | 81% |
At the stated volume, the operation experiences approximately:
- 11.8 discrepancy events per day: 620 × 1.9%
- 142.6 manual recounts per day: 620 × 23%
- 43.4 manifest mismatches per day: 620 × 7%
- 502 on-time credits per day: 620 × 81%
The average vehicle workload is:
620 pickups ÷ 11 vehicles = 56.4 pickups per vehicle per day
The critical observation is that the 38 minutes of value-added process time sits inside a 3.4-day cash cycle. The difference is predominantly waiting, batching, handoff delay, investigation and approval timing.
The Eight DOWNTIME Wastes in CIT and Vault Processing
The Lean DOWNTIME framework helps the team identify waste without confusing necessary security controls with unnecessary delay.
- Defects: Seal errors, denomination variances, counterfeit exceptions and manifest mismatches trigger investigation and rework.
- Overproduction: Teams may generate duplicate reconciliation reports or repeat checks for deposits already verified upstream.
- Waiting: Bags wait for depot check-in, vault capacity, a complete manifest, approval or the next credit-posting window.
- Non-utilised talent: Skilled vault and finance employees spend time searching for records, re-entering data and chasing routine confirmations.
- Transportation: Cash moves through the required secure network, but route back-tracking adds movement without adding customer value.
- Inventory: Work in process accumulates as unprocessed bags, unreconciled manifests and pending credits.
- Motion: Operators move between storage areas, workstations, paper records, scanners and separate systems.
- Extra-processing: Manual note verification, recounts and manifest checks may duplicate information already captured through seals, route records or electronic scans.
The most significant bottleneck is not necessarily the vault equipment. It is the handoff between physical verification and financial reconciliation. Until the manifest is trusted, the credit cannot be released confidently.
This is where the Analyse phase of DMAIC becomes essential. A team should use a Pareto chart for discrepancy causes, a box plot for route and processing-time spread, and control charts to distinguish common-cause variation from special-cause events. The objective is to identify root causes rather than simply accelerate every activity.
Future-State Design: Secure Flow With Fewer Manual Touches
The future-state flow should preserve dual control, chain-of-custody requirements and counterfeit controls while removing avoidable batching.

The proposed future state is:
Optimised Retail Route
↓
Standardised Pickup and Digital Seal Scan
↓
Depot Receipt by Planned Processing Slot
↓
Kit-Based Vault Processing and Single-Piece Flow
↓
Standard Denomination and Verification Sequence
↓
Barcode-Based Manifest Reconciliation
↓
Pull-Based Intraday Manifest Release
↓
Same-Day Customer Account Credit
↓
Exception Queue and Controlled Investigation
Five design changes create the improvement:
-
Route optimisation and standard work for CIT crews
Standard pickup sequences, route visualisation and departure controls should reduce back-tracking from 14% to a planning target of 3% or less. -
Kit-based vault processing
Each deposit moves through a defined processing kit containing the required tray, seal record, denomination sequence and verification checklist. This supports single-piece flow rather than large batches waiting for completion. -
Standard denominations and visual controls
Standard work should define the order of denomination processing, equipment checks, escalation criteria and handoff requirements. -
Barcode-based reconciliation
Scanning the bag, seal, manifest and verified amount creates a common transaction record. Manual verification is then reserved for exceptions rather than every deposit. -
Pull-based intraday credit release
Once a manifest meets defined verification rules, the credit instruction is pulled into the next available posting cycle. It does not wait for a blanket end-of-day release.
The SigmaFlow Value Stream Mapping and Kaizen workspaces can support this transition by keeping the current-state map, future-state design, improvement backlog, owners and control actions connected in one improvement environment.
Current Versus Future Performance
The following future-state figures are planning targets for this worked case. The daily volume remains 620 pickups; the vehicle capacity target is increased to 60 planned stops per vehicle per day, creating resilience without requiring additional demand.
| Metric | Current state | Future-state target | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash cycle | 3.4 days | 1.8 days | 47% reduction |
| Process value-added time | 38 minutes | 24 minutes | 37% reduction |
| On-time credit | 81% | Above 98% | More than 17 percentage points |
| Discrepancy rate | 1.9% | Below 0.5% | At least 74% reduction |
| Manual recount rate | 23% | Below 6% | At least 74% reduction |
| Route back-tracking | 14% | 3% or less | At least 79% reduction |
| Runs per vehicle per day | 56.4 average | 56.4 average; 60 planned capacity | Greater route resilience |
The future state does not eliminate every investigation. It creates a clearer distinction between normal flow and exception flow. That is the practical meaning of autonomation, or Jidoka: the process detects an abnormal condition and signals for human intervention without stopping every deposit for the same level of manual review.
Ninety-Day Kaizen Sequence

Days 1–30: Stabilise Routes and Standard Work
- Confirm the value-stream owner and baseline definitions.
- Observe CIT routes and document the 14% back-tracking pattern.
- Create standard work for pickup, seal confirmation and depot arrival.
- Establish a route departure checklist and planned processing slots.
- Build a discrepancy Pareto by depot, crew, route, denomination and manifest type.
- Confirm the measurement system for credit time, discrepancy rate and recount rate.
Days 31–60: Pilot Flow and Digital Reconciliation
- Introduce kit-based vault processing in one depot.
- Pilot single-piece flow for selected retail routes.
- Standardise denomination sequence and visual workstation controls.
- Test barcode scanning for bag, seal and manifest identification.
- Create an exception-only queue for mismatches and counterfeit alerts.
- Compare the pilot depot with the current-state baseline.
Days 61–90: Pull Credit and Control the Gains
- Extend barcode reconciliation across the three depots.
- Release verified manifests to intraday credit using a pull signal.
- Introduce daily tiered huddles for depot, vault and finance teams.
- Review a daily discrepancy Pareto and assign owners to the leading causes.
- Monitor cash cycle, on-time credit, recounts and discrepancies using control charts.
- Finalise the control plan, escalation rules and audit cadence.
Build the Capability to Lead the Improvement
VSM links directly to DMAIC. Define establishes the scope and customer requirements. Measure captures route, vault, reconciliation and credit performance. Analyse identifies bottlenecks, variation and root causes. Improve tests route optimisation, barcode controls and pull-based credit. Control sustains the gains through standard work, visual management and daily tiered reviews.
A Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt can support mapping, data collection and Kaizen execution. A Green Belt can lead the DMAIC project, validate the data and quantify the operational benefit. A Black Belt can coordinate cross-depot transformation, mentor improvement teams and connect the value stream to enterprise governance.
Lean 6 Sigma Hub provides CSSC-accredited online Lean Six Sigma training with practical case studies, worked examples, charts and self-paced learning.
Enrol in Lean Six Sigma training and learn to map, measure and improve the complete flow from retail pickup to credited funds.
Kaizen. Kai-Care. Kai-Done. Lean Six Sigma.








